SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 2543

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ABHAY S. OKA, J
S. RAJASEEKARAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 295 OF 2012



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Kishan Chand Jain
For the Respondents: Not specified

The court emphasized the need for effective implementation and public awareness of compensation schemes for hit and run victims under the Motor Vehicles Act, ensuring eligible claimants are informed of their rights.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 161 - Compensation for hit and run motor accidents - Court discussed the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act regarding compensation for victims of hit and run accidents, emphasizing the need for awareness and implementation of a new compensation scheme effective from 1st April 2022. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Implementation and Awareness - Court highlighted serious issues regarding the implementation of the Scheme for Compensation of Victims of Hit and Run Motor Accidents, noting low claim registrations compared to the number of incidents and stressing the need for public awareness and sensitization about the Scheme. (Paras 4-6)

(C) Directions Issued - Court issued directions to the Standing Committee for effective implementation of the Scheme to ensure eligible victims are aware of their rights and the claims process is facilitated. (Paras 8-9)

Facts of the case:
The case involves interim directions concerning the effective implementation of a compensation scheme for victims of hit and run motor accidents following the Motor Vehicles Act's amendments and introduced new provisions for compensation under the Scheme. The data highlighted a significant gap in claims submitted versus reported hit-and-run accidents.

Findings of Court:
The court directed a review of the Scheme's implementation, highlighting the Committee's responsibilities to enhance public awareness regarding compensation claims and ensuring that effective measures are in place.

Issues: The case primarily addressed the gaps in raising public awareness and actual compensation claims for hit and run accidents and whether the existing legal framework sufficiently supports victims in seeking claims.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled on necessary mechanisms for the awareness and application process under the new Scheme and the need for timely reporting and review by the relevant authorities. The court emphasized the importance of informing claimants regarding their rights and simplifying the application process.

Result: Directions issued for the Standing Committee to ensure proper implementation and reporting on the Scheme.

Judgement Key Points

Hit and Run Compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Section 161 provides for compensation in hit and run motor accidents: Rs. 2 lakh for death and Rs. 50,000 for grievous hurt, or higher amounts as prescribed, payable per the Scheme framed by Central Government. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)

The Compensation of Victims of Hit and Run Motor Accidents Scheme, 2022 (effective 1 April 2022) supersedes the prior Solatium Scheme. It establishes a Standing Committee (central level) for review, recommendations, and corrective actions; District Level Committees for local implementation, publicity, and quarterly reporting; Claims Enquiry Officer for initial processing (including FAR and post-mortem verification); and Claims Settlement Commissioner for sanction, with e-payment by General Insurance Council within 15 days. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)

Implementation issues noted: hit and run accidents rose from 55,942 (2016) to 67,387 (2022), but claims remain negligible (e.g., 205 received in FY 2022-23, 95 settled; 660 deaths/113 injuries compensated over 5 years totaling Rs. 184.60 lakhs). Causes include lack of awareness; Standing Committee must investigate, direct measures, and recommend amendments if needed. (!) (!) [5]

Court Directions for Effective Implementation:

  • Standing Committee: review General Insurance Council report, recommend Scheme amendments, issue implementation/public awareness directions, report compliance within 4 months. (!) (!) (!) (!) [8]

  • Interim measures (till further orders):

  • Police: if vehicle unidentifiable after 1 month reasonable efforts, inform victim/legal reps in writing of Scheme, provide Claims Enquiry Officer details; forward FAR/names within 1 month. (!) (!) [9]
  • Claims Enquiry Officer: enter details in register; if no claim within 1 month, refer to District Legal Service Authority for assistance. (!)
  • District Monitoring Committee (DLSA Secretary-convened, with Claims Enquiry Officer/DSP): meet bi-monthly to monitor. (!)
  • Claims Enquiry Officer: forward recommendation to Claims Settlement Commissioner within 1 month of claim. (!)
  • DLSA: form committees, submit quarterly reports up the chain to Supreme Court Registry. (!) (!)

Central Government directed to consider: annual enhancement of compensation amounts (due to inflation); one-time extension of Solatium Scheme limitation (previously 6-12 months) for past eligible claimants. Decisions within 8 weeks. (!) [11][12]

Police must classify accidents per Section 145(d) (unidentifiable vehicle despite efforts) and proactively inform/assist claimants.[6]


Table of Content
1. the court's discussion on interim directions for mv act's compensation in hit and run cases. (Para 1 , 2)
2. concerns about low claims compared to reported hit and run accidents. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. directions for the standing committee to enhance awareness and implementation of the compensation scheme. (Para 8 , 9)
4. requirement for the central government to consider extension of application periods for past cases. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)

ORDER

ABHAY S. OKA, J.

1) We have heard the learned counsel on the question of issuing interim directions for the effective implementation of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, ‘the MV Act’) relating to the grant of compensation in case of hit and run motor accidents.

2) Section 161 of the MV Act, as applicable from 1st April 2022, reads thus:

161. Special provisions as to compensation in case of hit and run motor accident.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or any instrument having the force of law, the Central Government Signature Not Verified shall provide for paying in accordance with the Digitally signed by ASHISH KONDLE Date: 2024.01.12 provisions of this Act and the Scheme made under sub-section (3), compensation in respect of the death of, or grievous hurt to, persons resulting from hit and run motor accidents.

(2) Subject to the provisions of this Act and the Scheme made under sub-section (3), there shall be paid as compensation,—

(a) in respect of the death of any person resulting from a hit and run motor accident, a fixed sum of two lakh rupees or such higher amount as may be prescribed by the Central Government;

(b) in respect of grievous hurt to any person resulting from a hit and run motor accident, a fixed sum of fifty thousand rupees or such higher amount as may be prescribed by the Central Government.

(3) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make a Scheme specifying the manner in which the Scheme shall be administered by the Central Government or General Insurance Council, the form, manner and the time within which applications for compensation may be made, the officers or authorities to whom such applications may be made, the procedure to be followed by such officers or authorities for considering and passing orders on such applications, and all other matters connected with, or incidental to, the administration of the Scheme and the payment of compensation under this section.

(4) A Scheme made under sub-section (3) may provide that,—

(a) a payment of such sum as may be prescribed by the Central Government as interim relief to any claimant under such Scheme;

(b) a contravention of any provision thereof shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to two years, or with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but may extend to five lakh rupees or with both;

(c) the powers, functions or duties conferred or imposed on any officer or authority by such Scheme may be delegated with the prior approval in writing of Central Government, by such officer or authority to any other officer or authority.”

3) In terms of sub-Section (3) of Section 161 , the Compensation of Victims of Hit and Run Motor Accidents Scheme, 2022 (for short, ‘the Scheme’) has been brought into force with effect from 1st April 2022. It superseded the Solatium Scheme, 1989 (the Solatium Scheme) framed under unamended sub-Section (1) of Section 163 of the MV Act. The broad framework of the Scheme can be summarised as follows;

a) The Scheme provides for the setting up of the Standing Committee and District Level Committees. The Standing Committee is at the central level. The primary duty of the Standing Committee is to periodically review the working of the Scheme, including consideration of the report of the General Insurance Council. The Standing Committee has the power to direct corrective steps to be taken. Another important function assigned to the Standing Committee is to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top