SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 12241

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
SAROJ DEVI – Respondent
C.A. No.-013730-013730 - 2024



The classification of a soldier's death can encompass deaths due to illness from extreme conditions while on duty, qualifying for Liberalised Family Pension.

Headnote:(A) Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 - Liberalised Family Pension - Death of army personnel classified as ‘battle casualty’ versus ‘physical casualty’ - Tribunal directed grant of LFP to widow of deceased soldier who died in extreme climatic conditions while on duty. (Paras 10, 11, 14)

(B) Legal principles regarding classification of casualties - The classification of a soldier's death as a ‘battle casualty’ can include deaths caused by illness due to extreme climatic conditions while on duty near the Line of Control. (Paras 10, 11)

(C) The standard of sympathy and consideration for the families of deceased soldiers is emphasized in military service cases. (Paras 13)

Facts of the case:
The deceased soldier died from cardiopulmonary arrest after being unable to be air-evacuated due to bad weather while on duty in a patrol near the Line of Control. His death was initially classified as a ‘battle casualty’ but later changed to ‘physical casualty’. The widow sought LFP after the denial of benefits.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the circumstances of the death met the criteria for classification as a battle casualty and upheld the Tribunal's decision to grant LFP.

Issues: The key issue was whether the soldier's death could be classified as a ‘battle casualty’ under military regulations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the soldier's death was attributable to illness caused by extreme climatic conditions while on duty, thus qualifying for LFP under military regulations.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

J U D G M E N T

ABHAY S. OKA, J.

1. Leave granted.

FACTUAL ASPECT

2. The respondent is the widow of late Naik Inderjeet Singh (for short, ‘the deceased’). The deceased was employed in the Indian Army on 27 th February 1996. He was part of an Area Domination Patrol. The Area Domination Patrol was launched from Manjit Main to Rangwar Post for domination of the Rangwar gap in the Signature Not Verified proximity of the Line of Control (for short, ‘LC’) along the Digitally signed by ASHISH KONDLE Date: 2024.12.03

Reason: Anti Infiltration Obstacle System (for short, ‘AIOS’). A fence Civil Appeal @ Diary No. 20250 of 2021 built by the Indian Army to prevent cross-border infiltration is known as AIOS. He complained of breathlessness during duty in extreme climatic conditions from 1.00 a.m. to 3.30 a.m. on 23rd January 2013. He was taken to the nearby Rangwar Post. The regimental medical officer found the condition of the deceased very critical. He could not be air-evacuated due to bad weather. Therefore, he was evacuated on foot. When he was taken to Chowkibal's MI room, he was declared dead. The cause of death was cardiopulmonary arrest. His death was initially classified as a ‘battle casualty’ but was later classified as a ‘physical casualty’ attributable to military service. The respondent was granted all terminal benefits, including a special family pension. As she was denied a Liberalised Family Pension (LFP), she filed an original application before the Armed Forces Tribunal (for short, ‘the Tribunal’). The respondent sought quashing of the order dated 10 th February 2016, by which the benefit of LFP was denied to her. She prayed for a direction to grant her LFP with interest. The appellants opposed the original application. Ultimately, by the impugned judgment dated 23 rd August 2019, the Tribunal allowed the application and directed that the respondent be granted LFP and ex- gratia lumpsum amount payable in case of battle casualties dying in harness. The present appeal takes exception to the said judgment and order.

Civil Appeal @ Diary No. 20250 of 2021 SUBMISSIONS

3. Shri Vikramjeet Banerjee, learned Additional Solicitor General, pointed out that LFP is governed by the order dated 31st January 2001 issued by the Director (Pensions) of the Ministry of Defence, Government of India. He submitted that LFP is granted in case of death of an armed forces personnel under the circumstances mentioned in categories D and E of paragraph 4.1 of the order dated 31 st January 2001. He submitted that, admittedly, category D does not apply to the deceased. He submitted that the case of the deceased is not covered by any of the clauses in category E. He submitted that as the deceased died due to cardiopulmonary arrest, his case was classified as a ‘physical casualty’ attributable to military service, and, therefore, the respondent was paid a special family pension. He relied on this Court's decisions in the case of Kanchan Dua v. Union of India and Anr. 1 , and Radhika Devi v. Union of India and Ors. 2 He submitted that the present case is covered by both decisions. He submitted that the view taken by the Tribunal is entirely erroneous.

4. Shri K Parameshwar, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent, supported the impugned

Civil Appeal @ Diary No. 20250 of 2021 judgment by relying upon documents annexed to the counter affidavit.

CONSIDERATION OF SUBMISSIONS

5. We must deal with the factual aspects. In paragraph

4.3 of the original application filed by the respondent, the following are the averments made:

“4.3 That while the husband of the applicant was posted in J&K and was part of Area Domination Patrol which was launched from Manjit Main to Rangwar Post for domination of Rangwar Gap in the proximity of LC and along the AIOS in extreme climatic condition on 23/01/2013 from 0100 Hrs to 0330 Hrs. The husband of the applicant complained of breathlessness and was taken to Rangwar Post where he was given First Aid. The con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top