SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 2611

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SHAURABH KUMAR TRIPATHI – Appellant
Versus
SHAURABH KUMAR TRIPATHI – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted. Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2. In a petition filed by the appellant for quashing the proceedings of a criminal trial, the High Court entertained the petition, but declined to grant stay. The High Court did not fix the case for hearing within a reasonable time. While passing the impugned order of rejecting the prayer for stay, the High Court simply adjourned the case to enable the respondent No.2 to file a reply. The High Court did not even fix a date for hearing. Hence, we set aside the impugned order of the High Court to the extent to which the application for stay was dismissed. Digitally signed by Anita Malhotra Date: 2024.02.07 18:02:02 IST Reason:

    Signature Not Verified We direct the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore to list the case before the roster Bench on 4th March, 2024 in the morning. The appellant and the respondents shall be represented on that day before the High Court. It is not necessary for t
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top