SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES – Appellant
Versus
FEMC PRATIBHA JOINT VENTURE – Respondent
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.
1. The issue for consideration before us is whether the timeline for refund under Section 38 (3) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act , 20041 must be mandatorily followed while recovering dues under the Act by adjusting them against the refund amount.
2. The brief facts relevant for our purpose are as follows. The respondent is a joint venture engaged in the execution of works contracts for the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation and makes purchases for this purpose. It claimed refund of excess tax credit 1 Hereinafter ‘the Act’.
Digitally signed by Indu Marwah Date: 2024.05.02 10:30:19 IST Reason:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.