SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 2655

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, SUDHANSHU DHULIA, JJ
NIDHI BHARGAVA & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS. – Respondent
CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 | SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.10664 OF 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [names not provided]
For the Respondents: [names not provided]

Income tax returns can be assessed for compensation claims based on the relevant financial year, regardless of filing dates.

Headnote:This appeal concerns the compensation awarded to appellants after the High Court's review. The Tribunal had awarded Rs. 31,41,000, which was significantly reduced to Rs. 16,97,370 by the High Court, citing the timing of income tax return filings. The court found the High Court's reasoning erroneous, emphasizing that the income tax returns should be considered based on the financial year, regardless of their filing date. The court restored the original compensation amount due to flaws in the High Court's logic, concluding with a directive for timely payment with interest.

Table of Content
1. injury resulting from vehicular negligence. (Para 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding compensation assessments. (Para 9 , 10)
3. assessment relies on relevant tax returns and previous judicial standards. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. final ruling to restore the compensation amount. (Para 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J.

Leave granted.

2. This appeal arises from the Final Judgment and Order dated 20.09.2018 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Impugned Order’) [2018:DHC:6122 | 2018 SCC OnLine Del 11494] in MAC. APP. No.589 of 2018 rendered by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘High Court’) filed by Respondent No.1-Insurance Company, whereby the High Court disposed of the appeal by reducing the compensation payable to the Appellants from Rs.31,41,000/- (Rupees Thirty-One Lakhs Forty-One Thousand) to Rs.16,97,370/- (Rupees Sixteen Lakhs Ninety-Seven Thousand Three Hundred and Seventy) maintaining the interest awarded at the rate of 9% per annum.

FACTS IN BRIEF:

3. On 12.08.2008, a Blue Line bus bearing Registration No.DL- 1PB-0035, being driven by one Javed Aftar in an allegedly negligent manner, hit a motorcycle bearing Registration No.DL-6SX-6483, which was being driven by Kapil Bhargava (hereinafter referred to as the ‘deceased’) along with his wife (Appellant No.1), as a result of which the deceased died in hospital and Appellant No.1 survived, but suffered grievous injuries.

4. The Appellants and other legal heirs of the deceased filed a Claim Petition viz. MACT No.357515/2016 under Section 166 read with Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) before the Court of the learned Judge, MACT-1 (Central), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’), claiming compensation for the death of the deceased for Rs.40,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Lakhs). After hearing the parties, on 20.03.2018, the Tribunal by a common judgment awarded a compensation of Rs.31,41,000/- (Rupees Thirty-One Lakhs Forty-One Thousand) with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the Claim Petition, i.e., 27.09.2008 till realization in MACT No.357515/2016.

5. The Appellants, being aggrieved by the Award/Order dated 20.03.2018 in MACT No.357515/2016 preferred an appeal, namely, MAC. APP. No.796/2018 before the High Court for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal. Respondent No.1, also aggrieved by the Award/Order dated 20.03.2018, preferred MAC. APP. Nos.589/2018 and 592/2018 before the High Court against, apropos MACT No.357515/2016 and MACT No.357259/2016, respectively.

6. The High Court disposed all the three MAC. APP. petitions by the common Impugned Order and held that the Income Tax Returns for the Assessment Year 2008-2009 were filed after the date of the accident, therefore, the income of the deceased had to be assessed on the basis of Assessment Year 2007-2008. While changing some of the heads of compensation granted by the Tribunal, the High Court reduced the compensation payable to the Appellants from Rs.31,41,000/- (Rupees Thirty-One Lakhs Forty-One Thousand) to Rs. 16,97,370/- (Rupees Sixteen Lakhs Ninety-Seven Thousand Three Hundred and Seventy). The High Court also modified the compensation under various heads from Rs.4,30,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Thirty Thousand) to Rs.3,94,543/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Ninety- Four Thousand Five Hundred Forty-Three) insofar as MACT No.357259/2016 was concerned.

7. The Appellants have filed the instant appeal challenging the Order of High Court only qua MAC. APP. No.589/2018.

8. It would be useful to set out the computation as per the Tribunal’s Award and the Impugned Order:

Sl. No.Name of HeadHigh Court (In Rs.)MACT (In Rs.)
1.Loss of Income16,27,370/-30,70,690/-
2.Loss of Estate15,000/-15,000/-
3.Loss of Consortium40,000/-40,000/-
4.Funeral Expenses15,000/-15,000/-
Total16,97,370/-31,40,690/- off [Rounded to 31,41,000/-]

APPELLANTS’ SUBMISSIONS:

9. The learned counsel for the Appellants submi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top