SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 2670

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ANGELINE RANDOLPH PEREIRA – Appellant
Versus
SUYOG INDUSTRIAL ESTATE PREMISES CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. – Respondent


2025 INSC 524 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5377 OF 2025 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.5432 of 2021)

ARUNKUMAR H SHAH HUF … APPELLANTS versus AVON ARCADE PREMISES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED & ORS. ... RESPONDENTS J U D G M E N T ABHAY S. OKA, J. FACTUAL DETAILS 1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal takes exception to the judgment and order dated 25th February 2021 passed by the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court. To appreciate Signature Not Verified the controversy, a brief reference to the facts of the case Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date: 2025.04.21 Reason:

would be necessary.

3. One Champaben Hiralal Shah owned a plot of land being Final Plot No.61 in Town Planning Scheme III, Vile Parle (West), admeasuring 2814.38 sq.mtrs. (for short ‘the larger plot’). On 1st April 1972, Champaben Hiralal Shah and the Hindu Undivided Family consisting of her three sons, Lalbhai, Ranjit and Arun, constituted a partnership firm M/s. CH Shah & Sons (for short, ‘the firm’) by executing a deed of partnership. The larger plot was Champaben Hiralal Shah's contribution to the firm's capital. After the death of Champabe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top