RAJANTI DEVI @ RAJANTI KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
ORDER
1. The Miscellaneous Application has come up for consideration on the compliance report submitted by the Registry alongwith its office report. 2. On 28.11.2023, this Court had passed the following order: “After arguing for sometime and on expressing our reservation in entertaining the petition, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. Permission as sought for is granted. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, during the course of hearing, it has been brought to our notice by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the High Court (Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar) had heard the matter and reserved the same for orders on 07.04.2022 and had released the matter as per the order dated 04.04.2023 i.e. almost after one year. We are extremely surprised as to how the order on the petition seeking anticipatory bail could be kept pending for one year. Digitally signed by RAVI ARORA Date: 2024.01.20 13:26:32 IST Reason:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.