SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1444

RAJANTI DEVI @ RAJANTI KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
BY COURTS MOTION

ORDER

1. The Miscellaneous Application has come up for consideration on the compliance report submitted by the Registry alongwith its office report. 2. On 28.11.2023, this Court had passed the following order: “After arguing for sometime and on expressing our reservation in entertaining the petition, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. Permission as sought for is granted. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, during the course of hearing, it has been brought to our notice by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the High Court (Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar) had heard the matter and reserved the same for orders on 07.04.2022 and had released the matter as per the order dated 04.04.2023 i.e. almost after one year. We are extremely surprised as to how the order on the petition seeking anticipatory bail could be kept pending for one year. Digitally signed by RAVI ARORA Date: 2024.01.20 13:26:32 IST Reason:

    Signature Not Verified The Registrar General of the High Court of Judicature at Patna may get the details of the matter and submit the report before 08.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top