SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9877

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
KAILASHBEN MAHENDRABHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This criminal appeal is against the dismissal of a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC to quash the FIR and the subsequent chargesheet against the appellants herein. By order dated 01.05.2018, this Court issued notice in the Special Leave Petition and stayed the criminal proceedings. The short and necessary facts for disposal of this criminal appeal are as follows. 3. Respondent no. 2 is the complainant. She was married to one Signature Not Verified Digitally sNignedi bryaj Mahendrabhai Patel in 2002, and he is not a party in these Indu Marwah Date: 2024.09.25

17:50:11 IST Reason:

proceedings. On 01.03.2013, the complainant filed a complaint, pursuant to which an FIR was registered on 25.03.2013 at P.S. Jalna, Maharashtra under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC against the appellants, who are her step mother- in-law (appellant no. 1), step brother-in-law (appellant no. 2), father-in-law (appellant no. 3), and the Munim (appellant no. 4).

The chargesheet in this case was filed on 30.07.2013.

4. A precise but accurate description of the allegations in the FIR are that, i) her husband is the son of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top