SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 12384

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, JJ
PRITI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
SLP(Crl) No.-008715 - 2024



Advocates:
Mr. S.R.singh, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sushant Kumar Yadav, Adv., Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv., Mr. Anurag Singh, Adv., Mr. Mangal Prasad, Adv., Ms. Gaurav Lomes, Adv., Ms. Radha Rajput, Adv., Mr. Ankur Yadav, AOR, Ms. Preeti Goel, Adv., Mr. Kameshwar Nath Mishra, Adv., Ms. Sakshi Kakkar, AOR

The High Court must decide appeals on merits when discharge applications are dismissed, rather than on procedural grounds.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 - Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(2)(v) - Accused seeking discharge - Trial Court dismissed discharge application citing sufficient evidence for framing charges - High Court found appeal premature as charges were not yet framed - Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits by the High Court without commenting on merits. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Appeal - High Court must decide appeals on merits where discharge applications are dismissed, rather than on technical grounds alone. (Paras 2-3)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner is accused in a case for various IPC offences and under the Atrocities Act, with a discharge application dismissed by the Trial Court. The High Court deemed the appeal premature since charges had not been framed.

Findings of Court:
The High Court has not provided findings on the merits of the case, only addressing the procedural aspect.

Issues: The main issue was whether the High Court should have decided the appeal on merits despite the charges not being framed.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the High Court to address the merits of the case rather than dismissing appeals on procedural grounds, ensuring justice is served.

Result: Petition disposed of with a request to the High Court to decide the matter afresh.

O R D E R

Heard learned senior counsel/counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State.

The petitioner is an accused in a case bearing Crime No.121/2022 registered with Police Station Sahaswan, District Budaun, Uttar Pradesh, for the offences punishable under Sections 420 , 467, 468, 471, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(2) (v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, in which now the charge sheet has also been filed. She was on bail given by the Court concerned and thereafter she moved an application for discharge which has been dismissed by the Trial Court vide order dated 02.05.2024 holding that there is enough evidence against the petitioner for framing of charges against the aforesaid Sections. This order was taken in appeal by the petitioner before the High Court. The High Court was of the opinion that the petitioner has approached the High Court prematurely inasmuch as although the discharge application has been dismissed but charges have not yet been framed against the petitioner. In other words, the Court has not gone on the merits of the case as to whether the discharge was proper or not?

Mr. S.R. Singh, learned senior counsel for the petitioner would argue that his appeal before the High Court, has not been decided on merits as it ought to have been done. Ms.Preeti Goel, learned counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh would argue that the charges could not be framed as the petitioner was not present on that date. Be that as it may, considering that the High Court has not given any finding on the merits of the case, we presently dispose of the present case with a request to the High Court to decide the matter afresh on the merits and remand the matter back.

We make it very clear that we have not made any observation as to the merits of the case and disposing this matter only on technicality with the above request to the High Court.

Interim order granted by this Court on 15.10.2024 shall continue till the disposal of the appeal by the High Court.

With these observations, the present petition shall stand disposed of along with pending application(s), if any.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top