SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE
THE STATE OF HARYANA – Appellant
Versus
AMIN LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS – Respondent
It looks like you've provided a response template for summarizing or analyzing a legal document with key points and references (e.g., (!) ). However, no actual
Please provide the full legal document inside
J U D G M E N T
VIKRAM NATH, J. 1. Leave granted.
2. The present appeal arises from the judgment and order dated 31st January 2019 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in RSA No. 3818 of 1987. The High Court allowed the regular second appeal filed by the respondents herein (original plaintiffs), setting aside the judgment of the First Appellate Court and restoring the decree passed by the Trial Court in favour of the plaintiffs. Aggrieved by the Signature Not Verified High Court's decision, the appellants (original Digitally signed by NEETU KHAJURIA Date: 2024.11.19 Reason:
defendants), namely the State of Haryana and the Public Works Department (PWD), have preferred this appeal.
3. The facts of the case leading up to the present appeal are as follows:
3.1 The dispute pertains to a piece of land measuring 18 Biswas Pukhta comprised in Khasra No. 2348 (0-10 Biswas) and Khasra No. 2458 (0-8 Biswas), situated within the revenue estate of Bahadurgarh, Haryana. The land is located on both sides of National Highway No. 10, which connects Delhi and Bahadurgarh.
3.2. On 28th March 1981, the original plaintiffs, namely, Shri Amin Lal and Shri Ashok Kumar, filed a suit for p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.