Leave granted. Keeping in view the fact that the appellant – Ganpat is more than 71 years of age; there is no document as to the hospitalization; and the injuries suffered do not appear to be substantial or serious in nature, we are inclined to modify the order of sentence passed by the trial court¹ and confirmed by the High Court², to the period already undergone by the appellant – Ganpat. We have already dismissed the appeal preferred by Babulal, the main perpetrator, vide order dated 02.01.2024. The impugned order of punishment qua the appellant – Ganpat is accordingly set aside and the appeal is partly allowed, reducing the period of sentence to the one already undergone. 1 Dated 02.05.2023 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Sarangpur, District Rajgarh, Madhya Pradesh in Sessions Trial No. 64/2019 @ First Information Report No. 0321 dated 11.07.2019 registered with police station – Sarangpur, District Rajgarh, Madhya Pradesh for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Section 25(1B)(b) of the Arms Act, 1959 was added in the chargesheet. 2 Vide judgment and order dated 01.09.202