SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(SC) 20885

B.R. Gavai, Vikram Nath, JJ
International Asset Reconstruction Co. Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Jayant Vitamins Ltd. – Respondent
CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 302/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Amar Dave, Himanshu Bhushan

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • practice and procedure
    • appeals
      • civil appeals (Para 1)
    • interlocutory orders (Para 1)
  • insolvency and bankruptcy
    • insolvency and bankruptcy code (Para 1)

Table of Contents

1. Civil appeal against interlocutory order of NCLAT refusing to interfere with recovery proceedings. (Para 1 )

2. The court found no ground to interfere with the impugned NCLAT order. (Para 1 )

3. An appellate court will not interfere with an interlocutory order unless patent error or injustice is shown. (Para 1 )

4. Appeal dismissed and adverse observations clarified as not barring other remedies. (Para 2 , 3 )

5. Can a civil appeal against an NCLAT order be entertained without showing a substantial question of law?

No, the court declined interference finding no ground to interfere with the NCLAT order. (Para 1 )

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 302/2020

INTERNATIONAL ASSET RECONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD. APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

JAYANT VITAMINS LTD. RESPONDENT(S)

(FOR ADMISSION )

Date : 18-04-2023 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH

For Appellant(s) Mr. Amar Dave, Adv.

Mr. Himanshu Bhushan, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The appeal is dismissed, in terms of the signed order.

(NARENDRA PRASAD)

ASST. REGISTRAR-cum-PS

(ANJU KAPOOR)

COURT MASTER (NSH)

(Signed order is placed on the file)

O R D E R

1. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

2. However, we clarify that any adverse observations would not come in the way of the present appellant in pursuing the remedy available to it in law.

3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top