2023 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1431
CANARA BANK – Appellant
Versus
RAPID METRO RAIL SOUTH LIMITED – Respondent
C.A. No.-000084-000084 / 2023
04-01-2023
RANBIR SINGH YADAV
1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Civil Appeal No of 2023
(D No 27675 of 2022)
Canara Bank
.... Appellant(s)
Versus
Rapid Metro Rail South Limited & Anr
....Respondent(s)
WITH
Civil Appeal No of 2023
(D No 31689 of 2022)
O R D E R
1
Delay condoned.
2
We find no error in the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
dated 6 July 2022 in IA Nos 284 of 2022 in Company Appeal (AT) No 346 of 2018.
3
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
4
Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
Civil Appeal arisin
g out of
Diary No 31689 of 2022
1
Delay condoned.
2
Mr Raunak Dhillon, counsel appearing on behalf of Rapid Metrorail Gurgaon
Limited (RMGL) and Rapid Metrorail Gurgaon South Limited (RMGSL), states that
in terms of direction 60(v) contained in the judgment of this Court dated 26
March 2021 in Rapid MetroRail Gurgaon Limited etc v Haryana Mass
Digitally signed by
Sanjay Kumar
Date: 2023.01.05
16:55:24 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
2
Rapid Transport Corporation & Ors1, RMGL and RMGSL have completely
effectuated the transfer of the operations, maintenance and assets (including
title) to Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) so as to fulfill the obligations
contained in the Concession Contract dated 9 December 2009, clause VI of the
order of the High Court dated 20 September 2019 as modified on 4 October
2019 and 15 October 2019.
3
In the event that there is any subsisting difference, HSVP would be at liberty to
seek recourse to its rights and remedies in accordance with law, including in the
arbitral proceedings.
4
In view of the above statement, the appeal is not pressed and is disposed of
accordingly.
5
Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
..…..…....…........……………….…........CJI.
[Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud]
....…..…....…........……………….…........J.
[S Abdul Nazeer]
…..…..…....…........……………….…........J.
[Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha]
New Delhi;
January 04, 2023
-S-
1
Civil Appeal Nos 925-926 of 2021
3
ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s).27675/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06-07-2022
in IA No. 284/2022 passed by the National Company Law Appellate
Tribunal)
CANARA BANK
Appellant(s)
VERSUS
RAPID METRO RAIL SOUTH LIMITED & ANR.
Respondent(s)
WITH
Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 31689/2022 (XVII)
(WITH IA No.200971/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT and IA No.200973/2022-STAY APPLICATION and IA
No.200969/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE
DEFECTS)
Date : 04-01-2023 These appeals were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, AOR
Mr. Sanjay Bajaj, Adv.
Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Mohammed Shahrukh, Adv.
Mr. Puran Mal Saini, Adv.
Ms. Anzu K. Varkey, Adv.
Mr. Ritesh Patil, Adv.
Mr. Yogesh Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Pati Raj Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Chetan Mittal, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Rajesh Goel, Adv.
Mr. Jatin Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Udit Garg, Adv.
Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv.
Ms. Stuti Bamba, Adv.
Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR
4
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Raunak Dhillon, Adv.
Ms. Ananya Dhar Chaudhary, Adv.
Ms. Ananya Dhar Choudhury, Adv.
Mr. Nihaad Dewan, Adv.
M/S. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, AOR
UPO