SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1431

CANARA BANK – Appellant
Versus
RAPID METRO RAIL SOUTH LIMITED – Respondent
C.A. No.-000084-000084 / 2023 04-01-2023



Advocates:
RANBIR SINGH YADAV

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Civil Appeal No of 2023

(D No 27675 of 2022)

Canara Bank

.... Appellant(s)

Versus

Rapid Metro Rail South Limited & Anr

....Respondent(s)

WITH

Civil Appeal No of 2023

(D No 31689 of 2022)

O R D E R

1

Delay condoned.

2

We find no error in the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

dated 6 July 2022 in IA Nos 284 of 2022 in Company Appeal (AT) No 346 of 2018.

3

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

4

Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

Civil Appeal arisin

g out of

Diary No 31689 of 2022

1

Delay condoned.

2

Mr Raunak Dhillon, counsel appearing on behalf of Rapid Metrorail Gurgaon

Limited (RMGL) and Rapid Metrorail Gurgaon South Limited (RMGSL), states that

in terms of direction 60(v) contained in the judgment of this Court dated 26

March 2021 in Rapid MetroRail Gurgaon Limited etc v Haryana Mass

Digitally signed by

Sanjay Kumar

Date: 2023.01.05

16:55:24 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

2

Rapid Transport Corporation & Ors1, RMGL and RMGSL have completely

effectuated the transfer of the operations, maintenance and assets (including

title) to Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) so as to fulfill the obligations

contained in the Concession Contract dated 9 December 2009, clause VI of the

order of the High Court dated 20 September 2019 as modified on 4 October

2019 and 15 October 2019.

3

In the event that there is any subsisting difference, HSVP would be at liberty to

seek recourse to its rights and remedies in accordance with law, including in the

arbitral proceedings.

4

In view of the above statement, the appeal is not pressed and is disposed of

accordingly.

5

Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

..…..…....…........……………….…........CJI.

[Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud]

....…..…....…........……………….…........J.

[S Abdul Nazeer]

…..…..…....…........……………….…........J.

[Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha]

New Delhi;

January 04, 2023

-S-

1

Civil Appeal Nos 925-926 of 2021

3

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s).27675/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06-07-2022

in IA No. 284/2022 passed by the National Company Law Appellate

Tribunal)

CANARA BANK

Appellant(s)

VERSUS

RAPID METRO RAIL SOUTH LIMITED & ANR.

Respondent(s)

WITH

Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 31689/2022 (XVII)

(WITH IA No.200971/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED

JUDGMENT and IA No.200973/2022-STAY APPLICATION and IA

No.200969/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE

DEFECTS)

Date : 04-01-2023 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, AOR

Mr. Sanjay Bajaj, Adv.

Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv.

Mr. Mohammed Shahrukh, Adv.

Mr. Puran Mal Saini, Adv.

Ms. Anzu K. Varkey, Adv.

Mr. Ritesh Patil, Adv.

Mr. Yogesh Yadav, Adv.

Mr. Pati Raj Yadav, Adv.

Mr. Chetan Mittal, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Rajesh Goel, Adv.

Mr. Jatin Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Udit Garg, Adv.

Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv.

Ms. Stuti Bamba, Adv.

Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR

4

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Raunak Dhillon, Adv.

Ms. Ananya Dhar Chaudhary, Adv.

Ms. Ananya Dhar Choudhury, Adv.

Mr. Nihaad Dewan, Adv.

M/S. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, AOR

UPO

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top