NAUSHEY ALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent
SLP(Crl) No.-003432 / 2023
29-03-2023
1
ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.16 SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).3432/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-01-2023
in A482 No.1315/2023 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At
Allahabad)
NAUSHEY ALI & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.53555/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T. )
Date : 29-03-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anupam Mishra, AOR
Mr. Anupam Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Jenis V. Francis, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Harikumar V. Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Mr. Anupam Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners would submit that the FIR in this case was lodged
on 11.08.1991, three decades back. Moreover, only a finger
injury was sustained by the victim Mahboob Ali, whose father
was the complainant and although the matter was compromised
amongst local village people. However, only because of the
charge under Section 307 of the IPC, the High Court has
Digitally signed by
Jayant Kumar Arora
Date: 2023.03.29
18:23:06 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
2
refused to entertain the application of the petitioner.
The respondent No.2 appears through counsel and he
supports the case of the accused.
Issue notice.
In the meantime, coercive step against the petitioners
should not be taken.
(DEEPAK JOSHI) (NAND KISHOR)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.