SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(SC) 19714

HIMA KOHLI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, JJ
THE WEST BENGAL COLLEGE SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
RENTU BISWAS & ORS. – Respondent
PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO(S).17479-17481/2023|SLP(C) No. 17476-17478/2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Kunal Chatterji, Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Mr. Subhrangsu Panda, Mr. Rohit Bansal, Ms. Kshitij Singh, Ms. Ina Bhattacharya, Ms. Mithu Singha Mahapatra
For the Respondents: Mr. Gaurav Jain, Ms. Abha Jain, Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain, Mr. Jaivir Singh, Mr. Abhishek Misra, Mr. Aniteja Sharma, Mr. Pijush K. Roy, Mr. Pritthish Roy, Ms. Kakali Roy, Mr. Rajan K. Chourasia

The court declined to interfere with the High Court's orders while leaving important legal questions open for future consideration.

Headnote:This judgment relates to the petitions seeking Special Leave to Appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution of India against the orders passed by the High Court at Calcutta on specific matters. The Court determined not to interfere with the impugned orders but left the legal questions raised open for future adjudication. The petitions were consequently dismissed.

Table of Content
1. court's decision not to interfere with impugned orders. (Para 1)
2. conclusion that the petitions are dismissed. (Para 2 , 3)

JUDGEMENT

IA No. 182354/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) Date : 06-10-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Subhrangsu Panda, Adv. Mr. Rohit Bansal, Adv. Ms. Kshitij Singh, Adv. Ms. Ina Bhattacharya, Adv. Ms. Mithu Singha Mahapatra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gaurav Jain, Adv. Ms. Abha Jain, AOR Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain, Adv. Mr. Jaivir Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Misra, Adv. Mr. Aniteja Sharma, Adv. Digitally signed by GEETA AHUJA Date: 2023.10.07 11:16:54 IST Reason:

    Signature Not Verified Mr. Pijush K. Roy, Adv. Mr. Pritthish Roy, Adv. Ms. Kakali Roy, Adv. Mr. Rajan K. Chourasia, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1. We are not inclined to interfere with the orders impugned herein under Article 136 of the Constitution of India . However, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the question of law sought to be raised in the present petitions is left open for adjudication an appropriate case.

2. The petitions for Special Leave to Appeal are dismissed.

3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(KAVITA PAHUJA) (NAND KISHOR) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top