Pavana Dibbur vs The Directorate of Enforcement - 2023 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9840

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Meenakshi Arora
For the Respondents: S.V. Raju

Table of Content
1. overview of case facts and background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments presented by the appellant. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. court's analysis of money laundering provisions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. interpretation of the schedule and related offences. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
5. court's statutory interpretation principles. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
6. conclusions regarding the appellant's case. (Para 27)
7. order quashing the complaint against the appellant. (Para 28 , 29)

ABHAY S. OKA, J.

short, ‘ED’), filed a complaint under the second proviso to

2002 (for short, ‘the PMLA’) before the Special Court for PMLA

shown as accused no.6 in the said complaint. By the order

the said complaint. The appellant filed a petition before the

the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘Cr.PC’)

Criminal Appeal No.2779 of 2023

Digitally signed by

Date: 2023.11.29

Reason:

impugned judgment and order dated 27^th September 2022,

‘ABS’) purchased a property bearing Khata no.37/22 at

the consideration of Rs.13.05 crores. The area of the said

convenience, we are describing the said property as ‘the First

property from ABS by a registere