SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
JABIR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
1. The appellants were convicted under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter “IPC”) and sentenced to life imprisonment as well as 7 years under Section 364, IPC and imprisonment for 5 years under Section 201, IPC. Their conviction and sentence was upheld by the Uttarakhand High Court.1 2. Haseen, aged about 7 years, was the son of Bisarat, (PW-1), a resident of Signature Not Verified Digitally sivgneidl blyage Akbarpur. He went missing on 08.10.1999. On 10.10.1999, at about NEETA SAPRA Date: 2023.04.19 Reason:
1 By judgment and order dated 05.10.2012 in Crl. No. 358/2004
16:30, the dead body of Haseen was found in the sugarcane field of Yaqub in Village Narayanpur, situated at a distance from Akbarpur, Haseen’s village. Information was sent to the Police Station Manglor. Inquest proceedings were held by ASI Dalchand, PW-6. The post-mortem was conducted on 11.10.1999 by Dr. A.K. Jain (PW-9). According to his statement, death had occurred about two days before the post-mortem examination.
3. PW-1, Bisarat moved an application under Section 156(3) Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter “Cr. PC”) on 19.11.1999. Based on the order of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.