VIKRAM NATH, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, JJ
RUCHIR RASTOGI – Appellant
Versus
PANKAJ RASTOGI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the fir and partnership dispute. (Para 2 , 3 , 10) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding jurisdiction. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on the elements of theft and intimidation. (Para 6 , 11 , 15) |
| 4. conclusion and ruling on the appeal. (Para 16 , 17) |
JUDGEMENT
VIKRAM NATH,J. Leave granted.
2. These appeals assail the correctness of the judgment and order dated 15.04.2019 passed by Allahabad High Court in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition Nos.31343 and 31370 of 2018 (filed by the respondents herein) whereby both the writ petitions were allowed and the First Information Report1 lodged by the present appellant dated 22.10.2018 1 FIR Digitally signed by SONIA BHASIN Date: 2023.10.19 18:06:10 IST Reason:
3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the relevant facts are as follows:
3.1 The appellant and the private respondents belong to the same family and the pedigree is as follows:
2 IPC 3.2 The appell
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.