Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJ, J B Pardiwala, J, Manoj Misra, J
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary to the Governor of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction invocation under article 32 (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 2. governor's duties regarding legislative business (Para 3 , 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. petitioner's and governor's arguments (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. governor's role as symbolic head in lawmaking (Para 14 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 26) |
| 5. importance of constitutional mandates (Para 15 , 17 , 18 , 28) |
| 6. adjournment vs prorogation distinction (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. speaker's authority over legislative procedure (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 8. valid sessions and governor's responsibilities (Para 44 , 45) |
| 9. disposition of the petition (Para 46 , 47) |
JUDGEMENT
Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Table of Contents I. Factual background ................................................................................................... 3 II. Submissions .............................................................................................................. 7 III. Analysis .................................................................................................................... 9 A. The Governor is a symbolic head and cannot withhold action on Bills passed by the State Leg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.