2023 Supreme(Online)(SC) 8352
JAGDISH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
SLP(Crl) No.-009768 / 2022
02-03-2023
ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHARMA
1
ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIB
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.9768/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13072022
in FBA No. 336/2022 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at
Nainital)
JAGDISH CHANDRA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.156348/2022EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.)
WITH
SLP(Crl) No. 1386/2023 (IIB)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. IA No.13020/2023PERMISSION TO FILE
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/ FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 02032023 These petitions was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, AOR
Mr. Manoj Goel, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Naman Kamboj, Adv.
Mr. Kumar Abhishek, Adv.
Mr. Sai Shashank, Adv.
Mr. Deepayan Dutta, Adv.
Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Sharma, AOR
Mr. Manoj Kumar Dwivedi, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Manu Padalia, Adv.
Mr. Ankur Prakash, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1.
Exemption Application is allowed.
Digitally signed by
VISHAL ANAND
Date: 2023.03.02
16:23:16 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
2
2.
The petitioners seek their enlargement on regular bail in
First Information Report No.001/2022 dated 06012022 under
Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A and 120B of the Indian Penal
Code (IPC) and Section 13(1)(c)(d)/13(2) of the Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 and 13(1)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption
(Amendment) Act, 2018 registered at Police Station Narendra Nagar,
District Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand. The petitioners were working
as Treasury Officer and ClassIV employee (Bundle Lifter)
respectively in the Treasury Office in Narendra Nagar, Uttarakhand.
They are alleged to have embezzled a sum of Rs.11,29,329/ and
Rs.5,13,542/ respectively. The first Petitioner (Jagdish Chandra)
was arrested on 07012022 whereas the second Petitioner (Dinesh
Prasad) on 28022022.
3.
It is also averred that the misappropriated amount has been
later on deposited in the treasury account.
4.
The investigation is already complete and chargesheet has
been filed. The charges could not be framed for the reason that one
of the accused is stated to be absconding.
5.
Since the trail is yet to commence, it will take some
reasonable time in conclusion thereof.
6.
Taking into consideration all these facts, but without
expressing any views on the merit of the case, we are inclined to
enlarge the petitioners on bail.
7.
The petitioners are, therefore, directed to be released on
bail, subject to their furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of
the learned Trial Court.
8.
The Special Leave Petitions are disposed of in aboveterms.
9.
Pending application also stands disposed of.
(VISHAL ANAND) (PREETHI T.C.)
ASTT. REGISTRARcumPS COURT MASTER (NSH)