SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(SC) 8018

SHASHI NAGPAL – Appellant
Versus
VIBHUTI JAUHARI – Respondent
SLP(C) No.-008837-008837 / 2023 28-04-2023



Advocates:
SHUBHAM BHALLA

1

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.11 SECTION IV-B

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 12883/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08-08-2022

in CR No. 3147/2022 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At

Chandigarh)

SHASHI NAGPAL Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

VIBHUTI JAUHARI & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.73139/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY

IN FILING and IA No.73141/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE

IMPUGNED JUDGMENT )

WITH

SLP(C) No. 7090/2023 (IV-B)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.70922/2023-ADDITION / DELETION /

MODIFICATION PARTIES and IA No.70919/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING

C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

Date : 28-04-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajive Bhalla, Sr. Adv.

Mrs. Priyanka Daggar, Adv.

Mrs. Priyanka Dagar, Adv.

Mr. Ajay Dabbas, Adv.

Mr. Anand Dabbas, Adv.

Mr. Yajur Bhalla, Adv.

Mr. Deepak Samota, Adv.

Mr. Shubham Bhalla, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Adv.

Ms. Prity Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Rishabh Chauhan, Adv.

Mr. Manikya Khanna, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned senior

counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2(on caveat).

Digitally signed by

NIRMALA NEGI

Date: 2023.04.28

17:03:44 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

2

We do not find any reason to interfere with the orders

assailed in these petitions. We are also apprised by the learned

senior counsel/counsel for the parties that the petitioner-Anita

Munjal has filed a suit in the Delhi High Court staking her claim

on the property involved in the SLP(C)No.7090/2023. That suit may

be examined by the High Court on its own merit.

The special leave petitions are, accordingly, dismissed along

with pending application(s), if any.

(NIRMALA NEGI) (VIDYA NEGI)

COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top