Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
K.V. VISWANATHAN, J
NIMMANAPALLI SURYA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER
The present Miscellaneous Application has been filed against the order of the Registrar (J-III) dated 6th January, 2023. There is a delay of 28 days in filing the Appeal against Registrar’s Order. Though there is no explanation, considering the fact that the delay is only of 28 days, the delay is condoned.
The Registrar in his order has noted that the main Special Leave Petition is purportedly against the final order dated 28th June, 2022 passed by the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad and sent by email on 29th June, 2022; that the defect of not filing the challenged case number was pointed out to the party in person- petitioner; that particulars sought for were required to be updated in the ICMIS and hence were relevant for enabling the office to further process the matter and that the party in person had replied by a letter dated 6thClick Here to Read the rest of this document
Special Leave Petitions cannot challenge administrative orders of the High Court.
Procedural defects in filing appeals should not prevent justice if rectified timely; the High Court's interference under Article 227 is limited to gross failures of justice.
The need for the Trial Court to decide the application of the Petitioner on its own merits and the imposition of legal costs as a condition for the liberty granted.
Huge delay of 1,633 days in filing Special Leave Petition cannot be condoned.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article