SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9064

DIPANKAR DATTA, J
RAMDEEN (D) THROUGH HIS PROPOSED LRS. – Appellant
Versus
RAMDULARI (NOW DEAD) THROUGH LRS. – Respondent
REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(S). OF 2023 (@ DIARY NO(S). 5194 OF 2023) IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 15990 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Pratibha Singh, Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary
For the Respondents:

Failure to timely file substitution applications leads to automatic abatement of petitions, necessitating applications to set aside abatement to proceed.

Headnote:(A) Procedural Law - Review Petition - Delay in filing application for substitution of legal representatives - No condonation of delay applied for or allowed; proceedings abate upon the death of a party unless abatement is set aside. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Limitation Law - Limits set for substitution applications must be adhered to; absence of such limits leads to automatic abatement of the petition.

Facts of the case:
This review petition concerns the substitution of legal representatives of a deceased petitioner and the necessity of adhering to prescribed time limits for applications to avoid abatement.

Findings of Court:
Final opportunity afforded to petitioners to cure the defects within a specified time, emphasizing non-compliance leads to dismissal.

Issues: The main issue addressed is the lack of a timely application for substitution and the implications of failing to adhere to deadlines.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reinforced that without an application to set aside abatement, the question of permitting substitution does not arise.

Result: Opportunity granted to petitioners to comply with procedural requirements.

Table of Content
1. opportunity for defect cure. (Para 1)
2. application for substitution must adhere to deadlines. (Para 2 , 3)
3. surviving petitioners must act to avoid abatement. (Para 4)

ORDER

1. Final opportunity is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) to cure the defects in the Review Petition within two weeks, failing which the Review Petition shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court.

2. Office Report reveals that IA No. 26082 of 2023 (application for substitution of legal representatives of the deceased petitioner no. 1) has been filed belatedly without any application for condonation of delay in filing the substitution application.

3. Once an application for substitution is not filed within the prescribed period of limitation, the proceedings at the instance of the deceased party abates. As it presently stands, the petition at the instance of the petitioner no. 1 (since deceased) has abated. Without setting aside of abatement, question of allowing substitution does not arise.

4. What is now required of the surviving petitioners is to file an Digitally signed by Rajni Mukhi Date: 2023.10.16 19:41:16 IST Reason:

    Signature Not Verified application for setting aside abatement together with an application for condonation of delay in filing the application for setting aside abatement. The surviving petitioners may file such applications within the period specified above.
    .............………......…....J. [DIPANKAR DATTA] New Delhi; October 13, 2023. for condonation of delay in filing the application for setting aside abatement. The surviving petitioners may file such applications within the period specified above.
    .............………......…....J. [DIPANKAR DATTA] New Delhi; October 13, 2023. ITEM NO.1718 COURT NO.5 SECTION IV-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 5194/2023 RAMDEEN (D) THROUGH HIS PROPOSED LRS. & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAMDULARI (NOW DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. Respondent(s) (OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT IA No. 26083/2023 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 26082/2023 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No. 26079/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION) Date : 13-10-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pratibha Singh, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1. Final opportunity is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) to cure the defects in the Review Petition within two weeks, failing which the Review Petition shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court.

2. Office Report reveals that IA No. 26082 of 2023 (application for substitution of legal representatives of the deceased petitioner no. 1) has been filed belatedly without any application for condonation of delay in filing the substitution application.

3. Once an application for substitution is not filed within the prescribed period of limitation, the proceedings at the instance of the deceased party abates. As it presently stands, the petition at the instance of the petitioner no. 1 (since deceased) has abated. Without setting aside of abatement, question of allowing substitution does not arise.

4. What is now required of the surviving petitioners is to file an application for setting aside abatement together with an application for condonation of delay in filing the application for setting aside abatement. The surviving petitioners may file such applications within the period specified above.

(KAPIL TANDON) (AMITA PANDEY) What is now required of the survi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top