B.R. GAVAI, B.V. NAGARATHNA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, JJ
PARSHURAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the unlawful assembly and subsequent altercation. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding attribution of roles in altercation. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
JUDGEMENT
1718 of 2022.
3.1 It is the prosecution case that the appellant Jalim Singh had constructed a shed (taparia) on the passage of the village which is used by the cattle. Since the said shed (taparia) was damaged by a buffalo belonging to the complainant party, appellant Jalim S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.