SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(SC) 11315

MOHD.BABBAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE(DELHI ADMN.) DELHI – Respondent


Advocates:
SHALLY BHASINB. V. BALARAM DAS

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 93 OF 2011

MOHD. BABBAN & ANR.

Appellant(s)

VERSUS

STATE (DELHI ADMN.) DELHI

Respondent(s)

O R D E R

1.

Originally, five accused faced the trial for

the offence punshiable under Section 302 of Indian

Penal Code for causing the death of Ms. Tasleem.

2.

The learned Trial Judge convicted all of them

for the offence punishable under Part-I of Section

304 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to

suffer rigorous imprisonment for 7 years.

3.

All the five accused preferred an appeal. Out

of them, accused No.5 (Mohd. Arafeen), who is the

brother of the appellant No.1 (Mohd. Babban), was

acquitted by the learned High Court.

4.

However, so far as the other four accused,

including the present appellants are concerned,

their conviction was converted to Part-II of 304 of

Digitally signed by

Deepak Singh

Date: 2023.03.02

10:08:17 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

2

Indian Penal Code and the sentence of seven years

rigorous imprisonment was maintained.

5.

Being aggrieved thereby, the present appeal

is filed by the appellants.

6.

Shr. Mohd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top