Back
M.M. SUNDRESH, J
M/S. SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
NAVEEN MATHEW PHILIP & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. enforcement of unilateral financial offers. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. need for restraint by high courts in financial matters. (Para 9 , 13) |
| 3. high court's jurisdiction should not interfere with statutory procedures. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. conditions governing article 226 powers and alternative remedies. (Para 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 5. appeals dismissed with guidance for future conduct. (Para 19) |
JUDGEMENT
M.M. SUNDRESH, J. 1. Leave granted.
2. Seeking enforcement of a unilateral offer concerning private financial transactions, while questioning the steps taken to recover the dues on the failure to comply with the one-time settlements, extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court was sought to be invoked. Acceding to the request made by duly interfering with the action taken by the Appellants, orders were passed, in exercise of the powers conferred under
3. Heard Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, learned Senior Counsel for the Appellants and Mr. Shyam Divan, learned Senior Counsel for the Respondents. Digitally signed by BABITA PANDEY Date: 2023.04.18 17:54:26 IST Reason:
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
