SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(SC) 390

NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY – Appellant
Versus
ZAHOOR AHMAD SHAH WATALI – Respondent


Advocates:
SHAKIL AHMED SYED

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.1937 OF 2019

IN

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.578 OF 2019

NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY

...APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

ZAHOOR AHMAD SHAH WATALI

...RESPONDENT(S)/

APPLICANT(S)

O R D E R

1.

After hearing counsel for the applicant for

some time, it appears that the grievance of the

applicant is limited to the observation in

paragraph 29 of the judgment dated April 02,

2019, which reads thus:

“29.

xxx

xxx

xxx

Additionally, the charge­sheet is accompanied with

documents D­9b and D­9c, which are photographs of

ex­militant Aftab Hilali Shah @ Shahid­ul­Islam (A­3)

holding AK­47, seen with other terrorists. These

photographs were seized from the residence of the

said ex­militant on 3rd June, 2017. The prosecution

case is that the respondent (Accused No.10) was in

constant touch with the said ex­militant Aftab Hilali

Shah @ Shahid­ul­Islam (A­3), as noticed from the

Digitally signed by

CHARANJEET KAUR

Date: 2019.11.07

18:21:48 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

2

inter­linkage chart depicted above. That fact is

backed by the CDR analysis report, also part of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top