SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(SC) 606

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
JAYANT VERMA . – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.F. NARIMAN, J.

1. A writ petition, by way of a Public Interest Litigation, filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, assails the constitutional validity of Section 21A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The aforesaid section was introduced into the Banking Regulation Act by the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act of 1983 with effect from 15.2.1984. Section 21A of the Banking Regulation Act reads as under:

21A. Rates of interest charged by banking companies not to be subject to scrutiny by courts

Notwithstanding anything contained in the Usurious Loans Act, 1918 (10 of 1918), or any other law relating to indebtedness in force in any State, a transaction between a banking company and its debtor shall not be re- opened by any court on the ground that the rate of interest charged by the banking company in respect of such transaction is excessive.”

2. It will be seen that Section 21A interdicts the reopening by courts of a debt between a banking company and its debtor, on the ground that the rate of interest charged by the banking company, in respect of a loan transaction, is excessive. The section seeks to keep out of harm’s way the Usurious Loans Act, 1918 and/or any othe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top