SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(SC) 356

ROSE NILIMA JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
ALEX VARGHESE – Respondent


Advocates:
R. SATHISHNISHE RAJEN SHONKER

ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.6 SECTION XVIA

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 232/2015

ROSE NILIMA JOSEPH & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

ALEX VARGHESE Respondent(s)

(with appln. (s) for stay and office report)

WITH

T.P.(C) Nos. 242-243/2015

(With appln(s) for stay and Office Report)

T.P.(C) No. 233/2015

(With appln(s) for stay and Office Report)

Date : 24/04/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

Mr. V. Giri,Sr.Adv.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. R. Sathish,Adv.

Mr. Mohan Das K.K.,Adv.

Mrs. S. Geetha,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker,Adv.

Ms. Anu K. Joy,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Both the parties along with their parents were present in the

morning. We sought the assistance of Mr. V. Giri, learned senior

counsel to mediate and work out an amicable settlement. Learned

senior

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top