SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Online)(SC) 109

S.B. SINHA,HARJIT SINGH BEDI
PURNENDU MUKHOPADHYAY – Appellant
Versus
V.K. KAPOOR – Respondent


Advocates:
PRATIBHA JAINYASH PAL DHINGRA

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 7

CASE NO.:

Appeal (civil) 4862 of 2007

PETITIONER:

Purnendu Mukhopadhyay and others

RESPONDENT:

V.K. Kapoor and another

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/10/2007

BENCH:

S.B. SINHA & HARJIT SINGH BEDI

JUDGMENT:

J U D G M E N T

[Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 145 of 2003]

S.B. SINHA, J :

1. Leave granted.

2. This case has a chequered history. Appellants herein were

appointed as Chargeman Grade-II. They were, in terms of the Scheme

dated 23rd April, 1965, required to appear in an examination for

appointment to the post of Chargeman Grade-II or Supervisor Grade-A

initially. They appeared in the said examination. They were, however,

appointed as Supervisor Grade-A on account of the marginal difference

in the marks obtained by them from the others who were appointed as

Chargeman Grade-II. The Director General on or about 4th May, 1967

taking into consideration the marginal difference in the marks obtained

by the appellants decided to give another chance to the appellants to

appear within six months in the next examination so as to enable them

to be graded as Chargeman Grade-II, in the event, if they qualify

therein

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top