B.N. AGRAWAL,P.P. NAOLEKAR,P. SATHASIVAM
HARIOM AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
PRAKASH CHAND MALVIYA – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 7
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 4696 of 2007
PETITIONER:
Hariom Agrawal
RESPONDENT:
Prakash Chand Malviya
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/10/2007
BENCH:
B.N. AGRAWAL,P.P. NAOLEKAR & P. SATHASIVAM
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
(arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.12573 of 2006)
P.P. NAOLEKAR, J.:
1. Leave granted.
2. The facts necessary for deciding the question
involved in the case are that one Maganlal Jain was the
original tenant of Prakash Chand Malviya, the respondent-
landlord. Maganlal Jain had given the shop to the appellant
for carrying out the business. On a dispute being arisen
between the respondent-landlord, the original tenant Maganlal
Jain and the appellant herein, an agreement was executed on
28.3.1988 by the respondent (landlord) and the appellant
(subsequent tenant), whereby the landlord tenanted the shop
to the appellant on payment of an advance amount of
Rs.4,75,000/- which was received by the landlord in cash in
front of the witnesses. The agreement further provided that in
case the landlord requires eviction of the tenant from the shop
he will have to give notice of 6 m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.