ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.15 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 13047/2020 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30-10-2018 in CMA No. 3029/2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras]

ANANDHI PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS SRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. RESPONDENT(S)

WITH SLP(C) No. 13048/2020 (XII)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)

Date : 08-05-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.V.Jagdishvaran, Adv.

Ms. G. Indira, AOR Mr. Gandeepan, Adv.

Ms. Amrita, Adv.

Mr. Anjali Singh, Adv.

Ms. Deepa Rathore, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Yasharth Kant, AOR Mr. Suryaansh Kishan Razdan, Adv.

Ms. Sonal Kushwah, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

SLP(C) No.13047/2020 Signature Not Verified D SN ig E ita H ll A y D si A gn S ed by 1. The petitioner has suffered grievous Date: 2025.05.08 Reason:

injuries including fracture in Hip bone in a motor to the tune of Rs.2,95,500/-(Rupees two lakhs ninety-five thousand and five hundred) with 7.5% interest has been enhanced by the High Court to Rs.7,56,300/-(Rupees seven lakhs fifty-six thousand and three hundred).

2. The compensation so awarded by the High Court appears to be just and fair and as such, we need not interfere with the order so as to enhance it further.

3. Hence, the special leave petition is devoid of merit and is, accordingly, dismissed.

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

SLP(C) No. 13048/2020

1. The petitioner has suffered 35% partial permanent disability due to the injuries sustained in a motor accident including fracture shaft femur was to the tune of Rs.2,41,000/-/-(Rupees two lakhs forty-one thousand) with 7.5% interest which was not disturbed by the High Court.

appears to be just and fair and we find no infirmity with the order impugned passed by the High Court in dismissing the appeal. As such, we need not interfere with the order(s) so as to enhance the compensation awarded any further.

3. Hence, the special leave petition is devoid of merit and is, accordingly, dismissed.

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(SNEHA DAS) (NIDHI MATHUR)

SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)