SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 3729

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN, JJ
RITIKA BHAVSAR – Appellant
Versus
ANUJ BHAVSAR & ORS. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Aruna Gupta, Mr. Yash Gupta, Mr. Ojas S.
For the Respondents:

Table of Content
1. transfer of case based on sufficient cause. (Para 1)
2. application for permission rejected due to defects. (Para 2)
3. transfer order issued by the court. (Para 3)

O R D E R

2. As per the Office Report dated 14-5-2025, the Respondent No.1 – husband has e-filed an application for permission to appear and argue-in-person along with power of attorney on behalf of the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 which are defective. The defects have been notified to the Respondent No.1 but he has not cured the defects so far. Thus, the said applications are rejected being defective.

VISHAL ANAND Date: 2025.05.16 Reason:

5. The entire record pertaining to the said case shall be transmitted forthwith by the transferor court to the transferee court.

…………………………………………J (J.B. PARDIWALA)

NEW DELHI

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.12 SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(Criminal) No.70/2025 RITIKA BHAVSAR Petitioner(s)

CORAM :

Ms. Aruna Gupta, AOR Mr. Yash Gupta, Adv.

For Respondent(s) :

O R D E R

2. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top