SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN, JJ
RITIKA BHAVSAR – Appellant
Versus
ANUJ BHAVSAR & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer of case based on sufficient cause. (Para 1) |
| 2. application for permission rejected due to defects. (Para 2) |
| 3. transfer order issued by the court. (Para 3) |
O R D E R
2. As per the Office Report dated 14-5-2025, the Respondent No.1 – husband has e-filed an application for permission to appear and argue-in-person along with power of attorney on behalf of the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 which are defective. The defects have been notified to the Respondent No.1 but he has not cured the defects so far. Thus, the said applications are rejected being defective.
VISHAL ANAND Date: 2025.05.16 Reason:
5. The entire record pertaining to the said case shall be transmitted forthwith by the transferor court to the transferee court.
…………………………………………J (J.B. PARDIWALA)
NEW DELHI
ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.12 SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(Criminal) No.70/2025 RITIKA BHAVSAR Petitioner(s)
CORAM :
Ms. Aruna Gupta, AOR Mr. Yash Gupta, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
O R D E R
2. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.