SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.R. GAVAI, CJ, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J
STATE OF U.P. & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
M/S. VIKRANT CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court considers the justification for requiring officer presence. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. the directive for state officers’ presence depends on case conduct. (Para 4 , 5) |
O R D E R
2. By the impugned order, though the learned Single Judge of the High Court has permitted personal affidavit of the Additional Commissioner Grade-2 (Appeal)-5 State Tax, Kanpur (Appellant No.2) to be filed, the Court has also directed the Principal Secretary, Institutional Finance, Government of Uttar Pradesh and the Appellant No.2 to remain present in person on the subsequent date fixed.
4. In that view of the matter, we set aside paragraph 8 of the impugned order.
6. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.
............................CJI ( B.R. GAVAI )
NEW DELHI;
STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Petitioner(s)
(IA No. 137214/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
CORAM :
Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Sr. Adv. Mr. Bhakti Vardhan Singh, AOR Ms. Poornima Singh, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following
1. Leave granted.
3. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.