Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 6562
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, JJ
MAANVI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DISHANK DAKSH – Respondent
Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1056 of 2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Raja Ram C. Iyer, Ms. Harsh Lata, Ms. Gargi Bhatta Bharali, Mr. Sharadendu Dwivedi
For the Respondents: Mr. Krishnagopal Abhay, Ms. Pari Bhardwaj, Mr. Rinku, Ms. Anita Kanungo
Judicial authority to transfer transfer cases based on convenience and justice as per statutory provisions.
Headnote:The judgment involves the petitioner’s request under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for a transfer of a matrimonial case pending in Moradabad to Delhi. The court found merit in the petition and allowed the transfer. The main issues were centered on jurisdiction and convenience in legal proceedings. The court reasoned that transferring the case would serve the interests of justice. The Transfer Petition is allowed in terms of Signed Order.
Act Referred
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks transfer based on jurisdiction. (Para 1) |
| 2. court allows transfer for convenience. (Para 2) |
O R D E R
1. The petitioner-wife has filed the petition under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 before this Court seeking transfer of Case bearing Matrimonial Case No. 19 of 2025 titled as “Dishank Daksh vs. Maanvi Singh” pending before the Family Court, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh to the Family Court, District East, Karkardooma, Delhi.
2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the grounds taken in the transfer petition, we allow the transfer petition and direct the transfer of case bearing Matrimonial Case No. 19 of 2025 titled as “Dishank Daksh vs. Maanvi Singh” pending before the Family Court, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh to the Family Court, District East, Karkardooma, Delhi Signa3ture. Not VerifiedLet the record of the case be transferred without delay.
Digitally signed by KAPIL TANDON Date: 2025.07.22 Reaso4n:. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned court for compliance.
5. If video conferencing facility is available with the transferee Court, the benefit of the same shall be extended to the parties.
6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
…………………………………………………………………………J.
[PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA]
…………………………………………………………………………J.
[ATUL S. CHANDURKAR]
NEW DELHI;
JULY 21, 2025 ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1056/2025 MAANVI SINGH Petitioner(s)
VERSUS DISHANK DAKSH Respondent(s)
IA No. 95711/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 95710/2025 - STAY APPLICATION Date : 21-07-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Raja Ram C. Iyer, Adv.
Ms. Harsh Lata, AOR Ms. Gargi Bhatta Bharali, Adv.
Mr. Sharadendu Dwivedi, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :Mr. Krishnagopal Abhay, Adv.
Ms. Pari Bhardwaj, Adv.
Mr. Rinku, Adv.
Ms. Anita Kanungo, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. The Transfer Petition is allowed in terms of Signed Order.
2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (KAPIL TANDON) (NIDHI WASON)
