SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA, MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN, JJ
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
SRI DARSHAN ETC. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court addressed procedural compliance for written submissions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties permitted to file timely submissions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court reserved judgment after hearing. (Para 8) |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
1. Application seeking exemption from filing official translation of the Annexures is allowed.
3. Judgment reserved.
5. Mr. Siddharth Dave, the learned Senior counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1 has also filed his written submissions.
7. So far as other accused persons are concerned, their respective learned counsel may file their respective written submissions not more than three pages within a period of one week from today.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.