SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 6784

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, JJ
AAKRITI BHUPAL @ AAKRITI JINDAL – Appellant
Versus
MEHUL JINDAL – Respondent
TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1079 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sabyasachi Mishra, Mr. Shivam Dixit, Ms. Ritu Reniwal
For the Respondents: Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain, Ms. Khushboo Tomar, Ms. Marbiang Khongwir, Mr. Parth Yadav, Ms. Mani Munjal, Mr. Shaurya Krishna

Transfer of cases between jurisdictions is permitted under specific sections of the CPC when justified by grounds presented by the parties.

Headnote:The petitioner-wife initiated a petition under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking the transfer of OP No. 1782 of 2024 from Hyderabad to Siliguri Family Court. The Court granted the petition after considering the relevant grounds. The primary legal question was whether the transfer was warranted based on the provided grounds, which the Court affirmed. The final outcome of the application was that it was allowed as per the terms stated.

Table of Content
1. court's allowance of transfer petition. (Para 1 , 2)

O R D E R

1. The petitioner-wife has filed the petition under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 before this Court seeking transfer of Case bearing OP No. 1782 of 2024 titled as “Mehul Jindal vs. Aakriti Jindal” pending before the Family Court Judge, Kalpatharu at Hyderabad to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Family Court, Siliguri, West Bengal.

2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the grounds taken in the transfer petition, we allow the transfer petition and direct the transfer of case bearing OP No. 1782 of 2024 titled as “Mehul Jindal vs. Aakriti Jindal” pending before the Family Court Judge, Kalpatharu at Hyderabad to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Family Court, Siliguri, West Bengal. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by KAPIL TANDON Date: 3202.5.07.24 Let the record of the case be transferred without delay.

17:35:30 IST Reason:

4. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned court for compliance.

5. If video conferencing facility is available with the transferee Court, the benefit of the same shall be extended to the parties.

6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

…………………………………………………………………………J.

[PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA]

…………………………………………………………………………J.

[ATUL S. CHANDURKAR]

NEW DELHI;

JULY 23, 2025 ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.7 SECTION XII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1079/2025 AAKRITI BHUPAL @ AAKRITI JINDAL Petitioner(s)

VERSUS MEHUL JINDAL Respondent(s)

IA No. 97013/2025 - EX-PARTE STAY Date : 23-07-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Sabyasachi Mishra, Adv.

Mr. Shivam Dixit, Adv.

Ms. Ritu Reniwal, AOR For Respondent(s) :Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain, AOR Ms. Khushboo Tomar, Adv.

Ms. Marbiang Khongwir, Adv.

Mr. Parth Yadav, Adv. Ms. Mani Munjal, Adv.

Mr. Shaurya Krishna, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. The Transfer Petition is allowed in terms of Signed Order.

2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (KAPIL TANDON) (NIDHI WASON)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top