SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K VINOD CHANDRAN, J
VISHNUPRIYA MARAR – Appellant
Versus
SUJAY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer of matrimonial case due to geographical inconvenience. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments about the feasibility and implications of the transfer. (Para 3 , 4) |
O R D E R
2. The proceedings have been initiated by the husband at the Family Court at Muvattupuzha, Kerala, which is the jurisdictional Court, insofar as the location of the marriage is concerned. The petitioner is now residing and working at Delhi and hence the transfer petition.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent points out that the transfer petition itself has been filed after two years and Signature Not Verified D Ni Ag Rita Ell Ny Ds Rig An e Pd R b Ay SAtDhere is a Power of Attorney executed by the petitioner and an Date: 2025.07.24
application for video conferencing has also been filed in the Family Court at Kerala.
6. Hence, on an equitable consideration this Court is of the opinion that the matter pending before the Family Court at Muvattupuzha, Kerala can be transferred to the Family Court, North West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi.
8. Accordingly, O.P. No.223/2003 pending before the Family Court at Muvattupuzha, Kerala is ordered to be transferred to the Court of Family Court, North West District, R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.