SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 7208

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN, JJ
PHIRERAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Rishi Malhotra, Sr. Adv., Mr. Shivaansh Maini, Adv., Ms. Ansuiya, Adv., Mr. Prem Malhotra, AOR
For the Respondents:

Table of Content
1. threat to complainant necessitates bail reconsideration. (Para 1)

O R D E R

connection with an offence of murder registered with the Surajpur Police Station, District Gautum Budh Nagar, State of U.P. It appears to be a case of honour killing.

3. Prima-facie, the High Court does not seem to have understood the purport of the application, which was filed by the petitioner herein. First, we want to understand what is this Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 and secondly, if a first informant is being threatened by the accused and it is brought to the notice of the High Court that some of the conditions imposed by it while granting bail have been breached, then the only remedy is to cancel the bail. We have not been able to understand why the High Court wants the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy under this so called Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 .

6. On the returnable date, the Investigating OfÏcer shall remain personally present with the papers of this investigation.

We would like to know the status of that complaint(s) also.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top