SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9217

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
TRESAMMA – Appellant
Versus
JOHN BOSCO – Respondent
Crl.A. No.-001277-001277 - 2013



Advocates:
Petitioner's Advocate: K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA
Respondent's Advocate: NULI & NULI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1277 OF 2013 TRESAMMA Appellant(s)

VERSUS JOHN BOSCO Respondent(s)

O R D E R

1. It is informed by the learned counsel for the parties that both the appellant and respondent have passed away. Consequently, this appeal is disposed of as having become abated.

2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

............................J (B.R. GAVAI )

...........................J (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH)

NEW DELHI;

Signature Not Verified

09th January, 2025 Digitally signed by DEEPAK SINGH Date: 2025.01.10 Reason:

ITEM NO.108 COURT NO.2 SECTION II-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1277/2013 TRESAMMA Appellant(s)

VERSUS JOHN BOSCO Respondent(s)

Date : 09-01-2025 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH For Appellant(s)

Ms. K. V. Bharathi Upadhyaya, AOR Mr. Sufyan Hasan, Adv.

Ms. Hema Malik, Adv.

Ms. Dr Poornima, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Anand Sanjay M Nuli, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Suraj Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Shivraj Singh, Adv.

Mr. Abhishekh Singh, Adv.

M/S. Nuli & Nuli, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order.

2. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.

(DEEPAK SINGH) (ANJU KAPOOR)

ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

[Signed order is placed on the file]

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top