Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, K. V. VISWANATHAN, JJ
MARIPPAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of complaint and allegations against the appellants. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides concerning parental involvement. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's reasoning about lack of evidence against appellants. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. the court's directive on quashing the proceedings against appellants. (Para 12) |
| 5. final remarks regarding the high court's earlier observations and decisions. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
BACKGROUND:
4. As per the prosecution story, the complainant alleges that she was in a relationship with the son of the appellants and established physical relations with the son, only on the assurance that he would marry her. On one occasion, the son of the appellants had taken her to meet them where they also agreed to accept her as their daughter in-law. But later, the son informed her that the appellants had fixed his marriage with someone else.
5. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that nowhere in the entire complaint there is any allegation that the parents had instigated or had misrepresented to the complainant that they would get her married to their son, [Accused No.1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
