Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SANJAY KAROL, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, JJ
RAMESH GANESH SAXENA – Appellant
Versus
DILIP JASARAMJI MALI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. high court's error in judgment reversal. (Para 2) |
| 2. observations on concurrent findings of fact. (Para 3 , 4) |
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. Appellant/landlord has challenged the judgment and order dated 20.12.2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Civil Revision Application No. 753 of 2023 titled “Dilip Jasaramji Mali vs. Ramesh Ganesh Saxena ” whereby the Revision Application filed by the respondent/tenant stood allowed.
3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered view that the High Court erred in reversing the concurrent findings of fact returned by the Trial Court as affirmed by the lower Appellate Court.
4. We have perused the issues framed by the Trial Court. The Trial Court vide judgment dated 20th April, 2023 found the Signaturer Noet Vesrifipedondent herein (tenant) to have persistently defaulted in Digitally signed by RAJNI MUKHI Date: 2025.08.01
18:23:27 tISThe payment of the rent prior to the institution of the Reason:
petition as also during the pendency of the proceedings. Such findings of fact stood affirmed by the lower Appellate Court in terms of judgment dated 02nd November, 2023.
5. The High Court, in our
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
