Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN, JJ
CHANDUBHAI @ DHARMENDRABHAI RAIJIBHAI TADVI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's order to allow for delay in proceedings. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's conviction for murder after altercation. (Para 2) |
O R D E R
2. The petitioner (convict) was put to trial for the offence of Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by CHANDRESH Date: 2025.08.08 Reason:
3. Being dissatisfied with the judgment and order of conviction passed by the trial court, he went in appeal before the High Court. 4. The High Court re-appreciated and re-evaluated the entire oral as well as documentary evidence on record and was convinced that the trial court committed no error in holding the petitioner herein guilty of the offence of murder.
6. In such circumstances, referred to above, we see no good ground to interfere with a very well-reasoned judgment and order passed by the High Court.
8. With the aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
