SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, JJ
BIPIN BIHARI SINHA @ BIPIN PRASAD SINGH – Appellant
Versus
HARISH JAISWAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. an appeal for specific performance was dismissed due to insufficient evidence. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court emphasizes the necessity for a thorough examination of settlement. (Para 7) |
ORDER
2. The Civil Appeal is allowed in terms of the Signed Order.
(KAPIL TANDON) (NIDHI WASON) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
3. On 13.05.2025 a Miscellaneous Application No. 7144 of 2025 was filed by the respondent for recalling our order dated 13.12.2024. It is alleged in the said application that the respondent Mr. Harish Jaiswal did not authorize anyone to appear in the matter.
2. That vide order dated 13.12.2024, this Hon'ble Court, allowed the Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 25905 of 2024 filed by the Petitioner and set aside the judgment and order passed by the High Court in Second Appeal No. 598 of 2016 on the basis of a purported Settlement Agreement entered between the Petitioner and Respondent/Applicant. At the outset, it is submitted that the Applicant never entered into any Settlement Agreement with the Petitioner. Further, the Applicant had never engaged any Counsel to represent him before this Hon'ble Court.
3. That as can be seen from the website of the Hon'ble Supre
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.