Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DIPANKAR DATTA, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ
Neha Bhagat – Appellant
Versus
Pratik Jaiswal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties mutually agreed to resolve disputes through mediation. (Para 1 , 6) |
| 2. settlement agreement detailed with financial arrangements. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. court confirms mutual consent and quashes pending cases. (Para 3 , 10) |
| 4. divorce granted under mutual consent, affirming resolution of disputes. (Para 5 , 8 , 11) |
| 5. court acknowledges effective mediation leading to amicable resolution. (Para 7 , 12) |
O R D E R
1. In course of hearing of this transfer petition, the petitioner-wife (Ms. Neha Bhagat) and the respondent-husband (Pratik Jaiswal) were referred to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre.
2. The process of mediation has produced positive results. The Mediator has sent a report that the parties have agreed to resolve the inter se disputes and differences amicably. It has also been decided by them to apply before this Court seeking dissolution of their marriage by mutual consent under Article 142 of the Constitution of India.
3. The parties have jointly filed an application (IA No. 192341 of 2025) under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, in view of such settlement. The prayers in the Application under Article 142 reads as follows:
a. Pass an order taking
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
