IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6310 OF 2011 BINDU KIRPAL ...APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS ARUN KIRPAL ….RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This appeal is against the judgment and order dated 9^th July 2008 passed by the High Court of Delhi in MAT APP. No. 51 of 2008 inter alia holding that the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was void in view of an alleged admission of the appellant that the marriage had in fact been solemnized on 5^th October, 2003 on which date both the parties had their earlier marriages subsisting.

3. The marriage between the appellant and the respondent took place on 23^rd October, 2004 after they had both obtained divorce from previous spouses and their earlier marriage stood dissolved.

4. Various proceedings were initiated between the parties to this appeal. The appellant and the respondent have now settled their disputes amicably and agreed to dissolution of their marriage by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Signature Not Verified Digitally signed byHindu Marriage Act subject to payment of Rs.48,00,000/-

MADHU BALA Date: 2018.12.12

10:30:44 IST Reason:

(Rupees forty eight lakhs