SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(SC) 860

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MANOHAR LAL SHARMA ADVOCATE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . – Respondent


ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.1 SECTION PIL(W)

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition (Crl.) No(s).172/2011 MANOHAR LAL SHARMA ADVOCATE Petitioner(s)

VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s)

(With appln.(s) for extension of time and office report)

Date : 10/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi Sr. Adv.(A.C.)

Ms. Sansriti Pathak,Adv.

For Petitioner(s) In-person Ms. Suman,Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta,ASG CBI Mr. P.K. Dey,Adv.

Ms. Rashmi Malhotra,Adv. Mr. Subhash Acharya,Adv.

Mr. M.K. Maroria,Adv.

No.1 Mr. Susheel Kumar Tomar,Adv.

Ms. Sujita Srivastav,Adv.

Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv.

No.5 Mr. S.K. Rungta,Adv.

Mr. Prashant Singh,Adv.

Mr. K. Kumar,Adv.

For Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv.

State of Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv.

Chhatisgarh Mr. Sandeepan Pathak,Adv.

Mr. Rahul Rajput,Adv.

Ms. Sakshi Kakkar,Adv.

State of TN Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv.

Signature Not Verified Ms. Nithya,Adv.

SARITA PUROHIT Date: 2017.01.14 Reason:

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. The submissions addressed by Mr. Rakesh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top