Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SANJAY KAROL, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, JJ
REENA PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. order granting leave and permitting service to the standing counsel. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. notices compliance and cooperation of the appellant during investigation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. conditions for retaining bail and overall cooperation importance. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. final decision to set aside the previous judgment. (Para 9 , 10) |
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant challenges the judgment and order dated 20.06.2025 in Misc. Criminal Case No.26977/2025 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Principal Seat at Jabalpur, titled “Reena Patel vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh”.
3. On 04.07.2025, this Court passed the following order:-
“The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no case of abetment of suicide is made out and admittedly there is no allegation in respect of demand of dowry.
Matter requires consideration.
Issue notice to the respondents returnable within six weeks.
The learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to serve the standing counsel representing the State of Madhya Pradesh in this court.
Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by In the meantime, if the petitioner is NAVEEN D Date: 2025.08.28
19:25:57 IST arrested in connection w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
