Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DIPANKAR DATTA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, JJ
PRADNYA PRANJAL KULKARNI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural background of the writ petition and initial subject matter. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the jurisdiction and maintenance of writ petitions post chargesheet. (Para 4 , 8) |
| 3. court's observation on the applicability of precedent and jurisdictional differences. (Para 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 4. clarification on the authority to quash fir and relevance of cognizance in jurisdiction. (Para 7 , 9 , 11) |
| 5. final direction for remand and reconsideration of the writ petition. (Para 12 , 13) |
Date : 03-09-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
Mr. Sandeep Kumar Dwivedi, Adv.
Mr. Awadhesh Kumar, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by rashmi dhyani pant Date: 2025.09.06 Reason:
“2) Learned A.P.P. on instructions from A.P.I. Ms. Radhika Kendre attached to M.I.D.C Police Station, Solapur, submitted that, during the pendency of present petition, the police have completed investigation and filed chargesheet before the trial Court on 14th May 2025.
4) In view of the above and by reserving the remedy of filing an Application for discharge before the trial Court in favour of the Petitioner, Petition is disposed off.”
1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
