SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Narasimha, Joymalya Bagchi, JJ
MURUGANANDAM – Appellant
Versus
MUNIYANDI (DIED) THROUGH LRS. – Respondent
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal is against the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in CRP.PD. No. 2828 of 2015 dated 26.02.2021, whereby the High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition filed against the order passed by the Trial Court on 21.04.2015 dismissing the interlocutory application filed by the appellant seeking permission to place on record a document dated 01.01.2000.
3. Short facts leading to the filing of this appeal are as follows. It is the case of the appellant that on the basis of an agreement of dated 01.01.2000, the respondent agreed to sell his property upon receiving part consideration of Rs. 5000/- and also put the appellant in possession of the property. Subsequently, i.e. on 01.09.2002, it is alleged by the appellant that the parties have agreed that the property should be sold at the rate of Rs. 550 per cent and in furtherance of the said transaction the appellant also paid a sum of Rs. 10,000/- and is said to have paid balance consideration from time to time. However, as the respondent was not taking any steps for executing the sale deed, he was compelled to institute a suit,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.